Key theories and research models for assessing factors affecting the adoption of traceability technologies in agriculture: A systematic literature review

Authors

  • Nguyen Thi Ngan FPT University – Greenwich Vietnam
  • Nguyen Quynh Trang Vietnam National University of Forestry

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55250/Jo.vnuf.11.1.2026.109-116

Keywords:

Agriculture 4.0, systematic literature review, technology adoption, TOE frameworks, traceability technology

Abstract

This study identifies and measures the factors influencing the adoption of traceability technologies in agriculture to inform policymakers, government authorities, and enterprises in developing digital-transformation strategies for sustainable agriculture. Using a systematic literature review (SLR) method, publications from indexed Scopus and Web of Science between January 1, 2019 and June 30, 2025 were synthesized. The review focuses on prominent theoretical frameworks, including the Diffusion of Innovation (DOI), Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), and Technology - Organization - Environment (TOE) framework. By evaluating the relative strengths and limitations of these theories and models, the study proposes the TOE framework as the most comprehensive foundation for subsequent qualitative and quantitative research. Furthermore, the findings highlighted the potential for integrating these frameworks to identify critical determinants and establish a robust model for measuring agricultural traceability technology adoption, specifically tailored to the Vietnamese context.

References

[1]. Patrizio Giganti, Massimiliano Borrello, Pasquale Marcello Falcone & Luigi Cembalo (2024). The impact of blockchain technology on enhancing sustainability in the agri-food sector: A scoping review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 456: 142379.

[2]. Samantha Islam & Jonathan M Cullen (2021). Food traceability: A generic theoretical framework. Food Control. 123: 107848.

[3]. Mona Haji, Laoucine Kerbache, Mahaboob Muhammad & Tareq Al-Ansari (2020). Roles of technology in improving perishable food supply chains. Logistics. 4(4): 33.

[4]. Robert Finger (2023). Digital innovations for sustainable and resilient agricultural systems. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 50(4): 1277-1309.

[5]. Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie, Patrick M Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C Hoffmann, Cynthia D Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer M Tetzlaff, Elie A Akl & Sue E Brennan (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj. 372.

[6]. Everett Rogers (2003). Diffusion of Innovations 5th. Free press.

[7]. Shaoling Fu & Yatao Huang (2024). Exploring farmers' perceptions of the technological characteristics of traceability systems. Agricultural Systems. 215: 103871.

[8]. Shuai, L. I., Jianjun, L. Ü., Baofeng, Z. H. A. N. G., Ning, L. I., & Jiawei, X. U. (2025). Adoption of Agricultural Product Traceability Technology in Enterprises Based on TOE Framework and Its Influencing Factors. Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery. 56(6): 130-136.

[9]. Icek Ajzen (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes. 50(2): 179-211.

[10]. Zehong Li, Yan Ding, Jian Chen & Minyan Zhao (2023). How far are green products from the Chinese dinner table?——Chinese farmers’ acceptance of green planting technology. Journal of Cleaner Production. 410: 137141.

[11]. Sha Lou, Bingru Zhang & Dehua Zhang (2021). Foresight from the hometown of green tea in China: Tea farmers’ adoption of pro-green control technology for tea plant pests. Journal of Cleaner Production. 320: 128817.

[12]. Xin Yang, Xiaohe Zhou & Xiangzheng Deng (2022). Modeling farmers’ adoption of low-carbon agricultural technology in Jianghan Plain, China: An examination of the theory of planned behavior. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 180: 121726.

[13]. Yatao Huang & Shaoling Fu (2023). Modeling farmers’ willingness to engage in traceability systems: toward sustainable agricultural transformation. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 7: 1254797.

[14]. Mohd Helmi Ali, Leanne Chung, Ajay Kumar, Suhaiza Zailani & Kim Hua Tan (2021). A sustainable Blockchain framework for the halal food supply chain: Lessons from Malaysia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 170: 120870.

[15]. Federica Caffaro, Margherita Micheletti Cremasco, Michele Roccato & Eugenio Cavallo (2020). Drivers of farmers’ intention to adopt technological innovations in Italy: The role of information sources, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use. Journal of Rural Studies. 76: 264-271.

[16]. Yatao Huang & Shaoling Fu (2023). Understanding farmers’ intentions to participate in traceability systems: evidence from SEM-ANN-NCA. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 7: 1246122.

[17]. Wang He, Chunjie Qi & Liang Ding (2023). The mechanism analysis on the farmers’ motivation of using the quality traceability system based on TAM-ECM model. Scientific Reports. 13(1): 22283.

[18]. Viswanath Venkatesh (2022). Adoption and use of AI tools: a research agenda grounded in UTAUT. Annals of operations research. 308(1): 641-652.

[19]. Lianying Li, Xin Min, Jinyong Guo & Feng Wu (2024). The influence mechanism analysis on the farmers’ intention to adopt Internet of Things based on UTAUT-TOE model. Scientific reports. 14(1): 15016.

[20]. Louis G Tornatzky & Mitchell Fleischer (1990). The processes of technological innovation Lexington. MA: Lexington Books.

[21]. Teck Lee Yap, Rajkishore Nayak, Nhung TH Vu, Duy Tung Bui, Thi Thu Tra Pham & Darcy WE Allen (2025). Adopting blockchain-based traceability in the fruit supply chain in a developing economy: facilitators and barriers. Information Technology & People. 38(1): 419-441.

[22]. Auzi Asfarian, Kautsar Ibrahim Hilmi & Irman Hermadi (2020). Preliminary user studies on consumer perception towards blockchain-based livestock traceability platform in indonesia: An implication to design. 2020 international conference on computer science and its application in agriculture (ICOSICA). IEEE. 1-6.

[23]. Maria Bonaria Lai, Daniele Vergamini & Gianluca Brunori (2025). Food Supply Chain: A Framework for the Governance of Digital Traceability. Foods. 14(12): 2032.

[24]. Carlos Parra-López, Liliana Reina-Usuga, Guillermo Garcia-Garcia & Carmen Carmona-Torres (2025). Promoting digital traceability in agriculture: A predictive approach to adoption and policy design in the olive sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 215: 124077.

[25]. ZHU Panpan, GAO Tiancun, DENG Junfeng & MEI Fuchun (2024). Intention analysis of fresh retailers to apply blockchain technology. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. 40(20): 269-277.

Downloads

Published

15-05-2026

How to Cite

Nguyen Thi Ngan, & Nguyen Quynh Trang. (2026). Key theories and research models for assessing factors affecting the adoption of traceability technologies in agriculture: A systematic literature review. Journal of Forestry Science and Technology, 11(1), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.55250/Jo.vnuf.11.1.2026.109-116

Issue

Section

Economic, Society & Development

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.